[IRPCoalition] human rights in ICANN
Marianne Franklin
m.i.franklin at gold.ac.uk
Mon Jul 7 13:59:58 EEST 2014
Dear Rafik
Thanks for these details, very useful. Now I am curious to know more
about the point you make at the end i.e. what sorts of problematic
regulation is being advocated and in whose national interests.
Your points below notwithstanding, can we take this report to be a
"dissenting opinion" within the GAC, along the lines of the US Supreme
Court when judges make their differences public? If so, then it still
remains a timely reminder that 1) how governments respond to the human
rights challenges they confront, and the need for UN member states to
put their respective houses in order in that respect and 2) there is a
lot of work to do in all areas of ICANN to move from principles to
practice..Here, if I may be so bold, I am not yet ready to see ICANN as
an example of best practice despite their contribution to the official
NETmundial outcomes. Good to see ICANN accepting the basic premise but
that is but the start so on that basis this report needs to be welcomed.
best
MF
On 07/07/2014 11:45, Rafik Dammak wrote:
> Hi Marianne,
>
> the report was written by 1 GAC representative and a researcher, it
> was discussed within the GAC but not endorsed (and probably won't be
> endorsed).
> regarding the GAC, in several occasions the members pushed for LEA
> requests without caring about privacy and data protection. there was
> no balance between LEA requests and what data protection authority
> comments such as the article 29 working group .
> GAC members are also trying to push for regulation without
> international law basis or pushing for more narrow national interests.
>
> Best,
>
> Rafik
>
> 2014-07-07 18:56 GMT+09:00 Marianne Franklin <m.i.franklin at gold.ac.uk
> <mailto:m.i.franklin at gold.ac.uk>>:
>
> Dear McTim
>
> Correct, it was a report about the GAC to some extent written, I
> believe, by GAC members.
>
> Either way, and correct me of course if I am wrong here on the
> finer points (:)), the points still remain available to debate, in
> terms of the substantive discussion raised by the report and
> Milton's review of it.
>
> best
> MF
>
>
> On 04/07/2014 19:25, McTim wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jul 4, 2014 at 11:16 AM, Marianne Franklin
> <m.i.franklin at gold.ac.uk <mailto:m.i.franklin at gold.ac.uk>> wrote:
>
> I agree with you though that this report form the GAC will
> lead to actions
> and not just words and here I also hope this will include
> the ICANN Board
> with and without those "ignorant members"..:))
>
> This was not a report from the GAC.
>
>
>
> --
> Dr Marianne Franklin
> Professor of Global Media and Politics
> Convener: Global Media & Transnational Communications Program
> Goldsmiths (University of London)
> Department of Media & Communications
> New Cross, London SE14 6NW
> Tel: +44 20 7919 7072 <tel:%2B44%2020%207919%207072>
> <m.i.franklin at gold.ac.uk <mailto:m.i.franklin at gold.ac.uk>>
> @GloComm
> https://twitter.com/GloComm
> http://www.gold.ac.uk/media-communications/staff/franklin/
> https://www.gold.ac.uk/pg/ma-global-media-transnational-communications/
> Co-Chair Internet Rights & Principles Coalition (UN IGF)
> www.internetrightsandprinciples.org
> <http://www.internetrightsandprinciples.org>
> @netrights
>
> _______________________________________________
> IRP mailing list
> IRP at lists.internetrightsandprinciples.org
> <mailto:IRP at lists.internetrightsandprinciples.org>
> https://lists.internetrightsandprinciples.org/mailman/listinfo/irp
>
>
--
Dr Marianne Franklin
Professor of Global Media and Politics
Convener: Global Media & Transnational Communications Program
Goldsmiths (University of London)
Department of Media & Communications
New Cross, London SE14 6NW
Tel: +44 20 7919 7072
<m.i.franklin at gold.ac.uk>
@GloComm
https://twitter.com/GloComm
http://www.gold.ac.uk/media-communications/staff/franklin/
https://www.gold.ac.uk/pg/ma-global-media-transnational-communications/
Co-Chair Internet Rights & Principles Coalition (UN IGF)
www.internetrightsandprinciples.org
@netrights
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.internetrightsandprinciples.org/mailman/private/irp/attachments/20140707/77cd6373/attachment.html>
More information about the IRP
mailing list