[IRP] IRP Digest, Vol 38, Issue 2
Jochai Ben-Avie
jochai
Sun Mar 18 21:02:30 EET 2012
Hey Dixie,
I'd be interested in participating in this call on behalf of Access. Did
you have a date/time in mind?
Cheers,
Jochai
On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 2:03 PM, <
irp-request at lists.internetrightsandprinciples.org> wrote:
> Send IRP mailing list submissions to
> irp at lists.internetrightsandprinciples.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>
> http://lists.internetrightsandprinciples.org/listinfo.cgi/irp-internetrightsandprinciples.org
>
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> irp-request at lists.internetrightsandprinciples.org
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> irp-owner at lists.internetrightsandprinciples.org
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of IRP digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Re: MAG Civil Society Representatives (Fouad Bajwa)
> 2. Human Rights at the IGF (Dixie Hawtin)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2012 04:40:57 +0500
> From: Fouad Bajwa <fouadbajwa at gmail.com>
> To: katitza at eff.org
> Cc: Robert Guerra <rguerra at privaterra.org>, Izumi AIZU <iza at anr.org>,
> William Drake <william.drake at uzh.ch>, Meryem Marzouki
> <meryem at marzouki.info>, "Salanieta T. Tamanikaiwaimaro"
> <salanieta.tamanikaiwaimaro at gmail.com>, irp
> <irp at lists.internetrightsandprinciples.org>
> Subject: Re: [IRP] MAG Civil Society Representatives
> Message-ID:
> <CAHuaJtMSK_0sV+cQygeTY6AnFKmOEJ_y5eyq8=DPfPxn8bJi5A at mail.gmail.com
> >
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> I'd like to support Katitza's concern that we should collaborate and
> bring in the actors that have been playing an important role and it
> may be that they are not so prominent but they have been working in
> the background. There is a need to reach out!
>
> -- Best
>
> Fouad
>
> On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 11:07 PM, Katitza Rodriguez <katitza at eff.org>
> wrote:
> >
> > We should try to hook up the initiative with IRP. No need to compete. You
> > should talk to Meryem Marzouki, she was leading the HR Caucus many years
> > ago. I will see her in Paris, and will hear her thoughts. We should talk
> to
> > Anriette (APC) too! They do good human rights work.
> >
> >
> > On 3/15/12 8:59 AM, Robert Guerra wrote:
> >
> > I'll float the idea to NGOs that are attending this weekend's Cyber
> Dialogue
> > in Toronto. If there's support, I'll send a note to the list to see if
> the
> > human rights caucus is still active..and if not, who would be interested
> in
> > re-activating it.
> >
> > cyberdialogue.ca
> >
> > regards
> >
> > Robert
> >
> >
> > On 2012-03-15, at 11:56 AM, Salanieta T. Tamanikaiwaimaro wrote:
> >
> > You can set up an ad hoc working Group within IGC to deal with Human
> Rights
> > issues and issue a call for volunteers.
> >
> > On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 3:52 AM, Robert Guerra <rguerra at privaterra.org>
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> From what i've been hearing from Human Rights Experts, it is very likely
> >> we'll have to re-activate the Human Rights Caucus for the meeting in
> Baku.
> >>
> >> here's a recent article worth looking at...
> >>
> >>
> >>
> http://www.rferl.org/content/how_azerbaijan_crushes_online_dissent/24515935.html
> >>
> >> regards
> >>
> >> Robert
> >>
> >> --
> >> R. Guerra
> >> Phone/Cell: +1 202-905-2081
> >> Twitter: twitter.com/netfreedom
> >> Email: rguerra at privaterra.org
> >>
> >> On 2012-03-15, at 11:42 AM, Katitza Rodriguez wrote:
> >>
> >> I think it might work like the CSISAC Steering Committee mailing list or
> >> NCUC Exec Committee mailing list. But you know: IGC members dont want
> that,
> >> I think.
> >>
> >> On 3/15/12 8:21 AM, William Drake wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi
> >>
> >> After a rather intense day of negotiations yesterday in which CS (NCUC)
> >> took on business, got a lot of heat, but eventually prevailed (on Red
> >> Cross/IOC), I'm a little hard pressed at the moment to view favorably
> >> launching yet another process to follow. ?But if someone could explain
> the
> >> clear need for such a group, what it would do, how it would work, etc.
> that
> >> would make it easier to think about either way.
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >>
> >> Bill
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Mar 15, 2012, at 7:46 AM, Robert Guerra wrote:
> >>
> >> Sala,
> >>
> >> My idea was just that, an idea. Prefer to get feedback from others?cc'd
> on
> >> this message first before suggesting it to the IGF list.
> >>
> >> Thus the question to those cc'd - Is there value of a CS only IGF
> >> strategic working group to discuss the upcoming IGF in Baku?
> >>
> >> Looking forward to your comments.
> >>
> >> regards
> >>
> >> Robert
> >>
> >> --
> >> R. Guerra
> >> Phone/Cell: +1 202-905-2081
> >> Twitter: twitter.com/netfreedom
> >> Email: rguerra at privaterra.org
> >>
> >> On 2012-03-12, at 1:16 PM, Salanieta T. Tamanikaiwaimaro wrote:
> >>
> >> Dear Robert et al,
> >>
> >> Kindly take the initiative to discuss this with the IGC when you deem
> fit
> >> to do so to suss out what they think etc. I can also see where you are
> >> coming from.
> >>
> >> Kind Regards,
> >> Sala
> >>
> >> On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 5:03 AM, Robert Guerra <rguerra at privaterra.org>
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Sala,
> >>>
> >>> Consulting the national and/or regional IGF's might be problematic.
> >>>
> >>> Not all national level IGF's have a strong CS component.?For instance,
> >>> the Russia IGF is dominated by pro-kremlin organizers and IGF -USA has
> a
> >>> weak CS component.
> >>>
> >>> Instead, let me suggest that it might be a good idea to??create a CS
> only
> >>> strategic working group - one that includes CS MAG members, IGC
> leadership
> >>> and key experts (academic and NGOs). The group being a bit more private
> >>> would be able to share more sensitive information and discuss strategy
> ahead
> >>> of docs being shared with the far more open IGC mailing list.
> >>>
> >>> The working group would in a way allow for a safe strategic space for
> >>> discussion and brainstorming.
> >>>
> >>> Suffice it to say, this is ?just an idea of mine for discussion...
> >>>
> >>> regards
> >>>
> >>> Robert
> >>>
> >>> R. Guerra
> >>> Phone/Cell: +1 202-905-2081
> >>> Twitter: twitter.com/netfreedom
> >>> Email: rguerra at privaterra.org
> >>>
> >>> On 2012-03-12, at 12:52 PM, Salanieta T. Tamanikaiwaimaro wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Thanks Robert, I agree. In light of this, perhaps we should consider
> >>> preparing for next year year's IGF by working with local and national
> IGFs
> >>> to be able to gather what their issues are from a civil society
> perspective,
> >>> that is from the Arab/Africa/Asia/Europe/Americas/Carribean/Pacific
> region
> >>> etc.
> >>>
> >>> This could even be a whole year's task and it would be open,
> transparent
> >>> and will involve the list.
> >>>
> >>> Kind Regards,
> >>> Sala
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 4:44 AM, Robert Guerra <rguerra at privaterra.org
> >
> >>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> let me comment below...
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On 2012-03-12, at 11:31 AM, Salanieta T. Tamanikaiwaimaro wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> > Dear All,
> >>>> >
> >>>> > Kindly see Katitza's advice in relation to the preparation of an IGC
> >>>> > Position Statement before the MAG meeting.
> >>>>
> >>>> It is my view that a position statement should be developed ahead of
> any
> >>>> MAG consultation. It is strategic to do so.
> >>>>
> >>>> This should happen at any open consultation and/or open MAG meetings .
> >>>> Such a statement should include not only a general comments, but also
> a
> >>>> specific set of recommendations for the MAG to take up.
> >>>>
> >>>> > Grateful if you guys could take the lead role on this in our list.
> You
> >>>> > will have the consolidated suggestions that was sent to the list
> earlier.
> >>>> >
> >>>>
> >>>> Those ?party to the MAG conversations, should share - in as much as
> >>>> possible - what issues are arising and what (in their view) would be a
> >>>> strategic intervention / recommendation. Without a clear view of the
> mood &
> >>>> sense of the MAG, it is hard to make a truly strategic intervention.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> > You can use this as a foundation for drafting a Statement and feel
> >>>> > free to use the Statement Workspace by initiating a Draft which
> will then be
> >>>> > posted for comments.
> >>>> >
> >>>> We first need to discuss key issues and/or ideas worth mentioning,
> >>>> develop a outline, and from there a draft.
> >>>>
> >>>> Where possible, we should be as open and transparent as possible in
> >>>> developing our comments. Statements should be seen as representative
> as
> >>>> possible of the CS view, and that can only be done if done in an open
> and
> >>>> transparent fashion.
> >>>>
> >>>> We need to figure out if we want to post strategic coordination on the
> >>>> open IGC list or instead - at times - have a smaller working group
> just from
> >>>> CS work on strategic documents.
> >>>>
> >>>> regards
> >>>>
> >>>> Robert
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Salanieta Tamanikaiwaimaro aka Sala
> >>>
> >>> Tweeter: @SalanietaT
> >>> Skype:Salanieta.Tamanikaiwaimaro
> >>> Cell: +679 998 2851
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Salanieta Tamanikaiwaimaro aka Sala
> >>
> >> Tweeter: @SalanietaT
> >> Skype:Salanieta.Tamanikaiwaimaro
> >> Cell: +679 998 2851
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Katitza Rodriguez
> >> International Rights Director
> >> Electronic Frontier Foundation
> >> katitza at eff.org
> >> katitza at datos-personales.org (personal email)
> >>
> >> Please support EFF - Working to protect your digital rights and freedom
> of
> >> speech since 1990
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Salanieta Tamanikaiwaimaro aka Sala
> >
> > Tweeter: @SalanietaT
> > Skype:Salanieta.Tamanikaiwaimaro
> > Cell: +679 998 2851
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Katitza Rodriguez
> > International Rights Director
> > Electronic Frontier Foundation
> > katitza at eff.org
> > katitza at datos-personales.org (personal email)
> >
> > Please support EFF - Working to protect your digital rights and freedom
> of
> > speech since 1990
>
>
>
> --
> Regards.
> --------------------------
> Fouad Bajwa
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2012 17:58:40 +0000
> From: Dixie Hawtin <Dixie at global-partners.co.uk>
> To: Fouad Bajwa <fouadbajwa at gmail.com>, "katitza at eff.org"
> <katitza at eff.org>
> Cc: Robert Guerra <rguerra at privaterra.org>, Izumi AIZU <iza at anr.org>,
> William Drake <william.drake at uzh.ch>, Meryem Marzouki
> <meryem at marzouki.info>, "Salanieta T. Tamanikaiwaimaro"
> <salanieta.tamanikaiwaimaro at gmail.com>, irp
> <irp at lists.internetrightsandprinciples.org>
> Subject: [IRP] Human Rights at the IGF
> Message-ID:
> <75DD12D44C82224E850C9BAECFCF719F1756F2009A at COLO-EXMB.ethical.local
> >
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> Yes, the IRP is still alive, although it has perhaps been a little quiet
> lately! After having achieved our main objectives of putting together and
> launching two great initiatives - the Charter for Human Rights and
> Principles on the Internet (
> http://internetrightsandprinciples.org/node/367) and the 10 Internet
> Rights and Principles (http://internetrightsandprinciples.org/node/397) -
> there is still really a need to think about what the purpose of the IRP now
> is, and how we can make a useful contribution to the current and future
> struggles to promote human rights within the Internet.
>
>
>
> However, in the meantime I think that there is still a strong desire
> within the IRP for us to play a role - at the very least as a space and a
> focal point for discussions around human rights in internet governance
> within the IGF. And given that the deadline for IGF workshop proposals is
> fast nearing, and given the discussion that we were just copied in to
> (which appears to be one that is cropping up a lot lately) I think some
> action is needed now.
>
>
>
> I would like to propose a conference call for all those concerned with
> promoting human rights as an issue at the IGF and during the IGF-planning
> process, i.e. not just IRP members, to discuss what needs to be done over
> the next nine months (are there particular issues we need to highlight?
> particular processes we need to get engaged with? etc.) This would put us
> all in a better position to see what role different groups can play (IGC,
> IRP, APC, Access, EFF etc) and also highlight gaps, and thus hopefully for
> us all to be more co-ordinated and effective.
>
>
>
> If people agree this is a good idea please let me know and I am happy to
> help coordinate organising the call!
>
>
>
> Also, Sala - you may be interested in this report of a similar exercise we
> did in 2010, gathering evidence of human rights discussion at regional
> IGFs: http://internetrightsandprinciples.org/node/361
>
>
>
> Very best,
>
> Dixie
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: irp-bounces at lists.internetrightsandprinciples.org [mailto:
> irp-bounces at lists.internetrightsandprinciples.org] On Behalf Of Fouad
> Bajwa
> Sent: 15 March 2012 23:41
> To: katitza at eff.org
> Cc: Robert Guerra; Izumi AIZU; William Drake; Meryem Marzouki; Salanieta
> T. Tamanikaiwaimaro; irp
> Subject: Re: [IRP] MAG Civil Society Representatives
>
>
>
> I'd like to support Katitza's concern that we should collaborate and bring
> in the actors that have been playing an important role and it may be that
> they are not so prominent but they have been working in the background.
> There is a need to reach out!
>
>
>
> -- Best
>
>
>
> Fouad
>
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 11:07 PM, Katitza Rodriguez <katitza at eff.org
> <mailto:katitza at eff.org>> wrote:
>
> >
>
> > We should try to hook up the initiative with IRP. No need to compete.
>
> > You should talk to Meryem Marzouki, she was leading the HR Caucus many
>
> > years ago. I will see her in Paris, and will hear her thoughts. We
>
> > should talk to Anriette (APC) too! They do good human rights work.
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > On 3/15/12 8:59 AM, Robert Guerra wrote:
>
> >
>
> > I'll float the idea to NGOs that are attending this weekend's Cyber
>
> > Dialogue in Toronto. If there's support, I'll send a note to the list
>
> > to see if the human rights caucus is still active..and if not, who
>
> > would be interested in re-activating it.
>
> >
>
> > cyberdialogue.ca
>
> >
>
> > regards
>
> >
>
> > Robert
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > On 2012-03-15, at 11:56 AM, Salanieta T. Tamanikaiwaimaro wrote:
>
> >
>
> > You can set up an ad hoc working Group within IGC to deal with Human
>
> > Rights issues and issue a call for volunteers.
>
> >
>
> > On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 3:52 AM, Robert Guerra
>
> > <rguerra at privaterra.org<mailto:rguerra at privaterra.org>>
>
> > wrote:
>
> >>
>
> >> From what i've been hearing from Human Rights Experts, it is very
>
> >> likely we'll have to re-activate the Human Rights Caucus for the
> meeting in Baku.
>
> >>
>
> >> here's a recent article worth looking at...
>
> >>
>
> >>
>
> >> http://www.rferl.org/content/how_azerbaijan_crushes_online_dissent/24
>
> >> 515935.html
>
> >>
>
> >> regards
>
> >>
>
> >> Robert
>
> >>
>
> >> --
>
> >> R. Guerra
>
> >> Phone/Cell: +1 202-905-2081
>
> >> Twitter: twitter.com/netfreedom
>
> >> Email: rguerra at privaterra.org<mailto:rguerra at privaterra.org>
>
> >>
>
> >> On 2012-03-15, at 11:42 AM, Katitza Rodriguez wrote:
>
> >>
>
> >> I think it might work like the CSISAC Steering Committee mailing list
>
> >> or NCUC Exec Committee mailing list. But you know: IGC members dont
>
> >> want that, I think.
>
> >>
>
> >> On 3/15/12 8:21 AM, William Drake wrote:
>
> >>
>
> >> Hi
>
> >>
>
> >> After a rather intense day of negotiations yesterday in which CS
>
> >> (NCUC) took on business, got a lot of heat, but eventually prevailed
>
> >> (on Red Cross/IOC), I'm a little hard pressed at the moment to view
>
> >> favorably launching yet another process to follow. But if someone
>
> >> could explain the clear need for such a group, what it would do, how
>
> >> it would work, etc. that would make it easier to think about either way.
>
> >>
>
> >> Thanks
>
> >>
>
> >> Bill
>
> >>
>
> >>
>
> >>
>
> >> On Mar 15, 2012, at 7:46 AM, Robert Guerra wrote:
>
> >>
>
> >> Sala,
>
> >>
>
> >> My idea was just that, an idea. Prefer to get feedback from others
>
> >> cc'd on this message first before suggesting it to the IGF list.
>
> >>
>
> >> Thus the question to those cc'd - Is there value of a CS only IGF
>
> >> strategic working group to discuss the upcoming IGF in Baku?
>
> >>
>
> >> Looking forward to your comments.
>
> >>
>
> >> regards
>
> >>
>
> >> Robert
>
> >>
>
> >> --
>
> >> R. Guerra
>
> >> Phone/Cell: +1 202-905-2081
>
> >> Twitter: twitter.com/netfreedom
>
> >> Email: rguerra at privaterra.org<mailto:rguerra at privaterra.org>
>
> >>
>
> >> On 2012-03-12, at 1:16 PM, Salanieta T. Tamanikaiwaimaro wrote:
>
> >>
>
> >> Dear Robert et al,
>
> >>
>
> >> Kindly take the initiative to discuss this with the IGC when you deem
>
> >> fit to do so to suss out what they think etc. I can also see where
>
> >> you are coming from.
>
> >>
>
> >> Kind Regards,
>
> >> Sala
>
> >>
>
> >> On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 5:03 AM, Robert Guerra
>
> >> <rguerra at privaterra.org<mailto:rguerra at privaterra.org>>
>
> >> wrote:
>
> >>>
>
> >>> Sala,
>
> >>>
>
> >>> Consulting the national and/or regional IGF's might be problematic.
>
> >>>
>
> >>> Not all national level IGF's have a strong CS component. For
>
> >>> instance, the Russia IGF is dominated by pro-kremlin organizers and
>
> >>> IGF -USA has a weak CS component.
>
> >>>
>
> >>> Instead, let me suggest that it might be a good idea to create a CS
>
> >>> only strategic working group - one that includes CS MAG members, IGC
>
> >>> leadership and key experts (academic and NGOs). The group being a
>
> >>> bit more private would be able to share more sensitive information
>
> >>> and discuss strategy ahead of docs being shared with the far more open
> IGC mailing list.
>
> >>>
>
> >>> The working group would in a way allow for a safe strategic space
>
> >>> for discussion and brainstorming.
>
> >>>
>
> >>> Suffice it to say, this is just an idea of mine for discussion...
>
> >>>
>
> >>> regards
>
> >>>
>
> >>> Robert
>
> >>>
>
> >>> R. Guerra
>
> >>> Phone/Cell: +1 202-905-2081
>
> >>> Twitter: twitter.com/netfreedom
>
> >>> Email: rguerra at privaterra.org<mailto:rguerra at privaterra.org>
>
> >>>
>
> >>> On 2012-03-12, at 12:52 PM, Salanieta T. Tamanikaiwaimaro wrote:
>
> >>>
>
> >>> Thanks Robert, I agree. In light of this, perhaps we should consider
>
> >>> preparing for next year year's IGF by working with local and
>
> >>> national IGFs to be able to gather what their issues are from a
>
> >>> civil society perspective, that is from the
>
> >>> Arab/Africa/Asia/Europe/Americas/Carribean/Pacific region etc.
>
> >>>
>
> >>> This could even be a whole year's task and it would be open,
>
> >>> transparent and will involve the list.
>
> >>>
>
> >>> Kind Regards,
>
> >>> Sala
>
> >>>
>
> >>> On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 4:44 AM, Robert Guerra
>
> >>> <rguerra at privaterra.org<mailto:rguerra at privaterra.org>>
>
> >>> wrote:
>
> >>>>
>
> >>>> let me comment below...
>
> >>>>
>
> >>>>
>
> >>>> On 2012-03-12, at 11:31 AM, Salanieta T. Tamanikaiwaimaro wrote:
>
> >>>>
>
> >>>> > Dear All,
>
> >>>> >
>
> >>>> > Kindly see Katitza's advice in relation to the preparation of an
>
> >>>> > IGC Position Statement before the MAG meeting.
>
> >>>>
>
> >>>> It is my view that a position statement should be developed ahead
>
> >>>> of any MAG consultation. It is strategic to do so.
>
> >>>>
>
> >>>> This should happen at any open consultation and/or open MAG meetings .
>
> >>>> Such a statement should include not only a general comments, but
>
> >>>> also a specific set of recommendations for the MAG to take up.
>
> >>>>
>
> >>>> > Grateful if you guys could take the lead role on this in our
>
> >>>> > list. You will have the consolidated suggestions that was sent to
> the list earlier.
>
> >>>> >
>
> >>>>
>
> >>>> Those party to the MAG conversations, should share - in as much as
>
> >>>> possible - what issues are arising and what (in their view) would
>
> >>>> be a strategic intervention / recommendation. Without a clear view
>
> >>>> of the mood & sense of the MAG, it is hard to make a truly strategic
> intervention.
>
> >>>>
>
> >>>>
>
> >>>> > You can use this as a foundation for drafting a Statement and
>
> >>>> > feel free to use the Statement Workspace by initiating a Draft
>
> >>>> > which will then be posted for comments.
>
> >>>> >
>
> >>>> We first need to discuss key issues and/or ideas worth mentioning,
>
> >>>> develop a outline, and from there a draft.
>
> >>>>
>
> >>>> Where possible, we should be as open and transparent as possible in
>
> >>>> developing our comments. Statements should be seen as
>
> >>>> representative as possible of the CS view, and that can only be
>
> >>>> done if done in an open and transparent fashion.
>
> >>>>
>
> >>>> We need to figure out if we want to post strategic coordination on
>
> >>>> the open IGC list or instead - at times - have a smaller working
>
> >>>> group just from CS work on strategic documents.
>
> >>>>
>
> >>>> regards
>
> >>>>
>
> >>>> Robert
>
> >>>
>
> >>>
>
> >>>
>
> >>>
>
> >>> --
>
> >>> Salanieta Tamanikaiwaimaro aka Sala
>
> >>>
>
> >>> Tweeter: @SalanietaT
>
> >>> Skype:Salanieta.Tamanikaiwaimaro
>
> >>> Cell: +679 998 2851
>
> >>>
>
> >>>
>
> >>>
>
> >>>
>
> >>
>
> >>
>
> >>
>
> >> --
>
> >> Salanieta Tamanikaiwaimaro aka Sala
>
> >>
>
> >> Tweeter: @SalanietaT
>
> >> Skype:Salanieta.Tamanikaiwaimaro
>
> >> Cell: +679 998 2851
>
> >>
>
> >>
>
> >>
>
> >>
>
> >>
>
> >>
>
> >>
>
> >> --
>
> >> Katitza Rodriguez
>
> >> International Rights Director
>
> >> Electronic Frontier Foundation
>
> >> katitza at eff.org<mailto:katitza at eff.org>
>
> >> katitza at datos-personales.org<mailto:katitza at datos-personales.org>
> (personal email)
>
> >>
>
> >> Please support EFF - Working to protect your digital rights and
>
> >> freedom of speech since 1990
>
> >>
>
> >>
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > --
>
> > Salanieta Tamanikaiwaimaro aka Sala
>
> >
>
> > Tweeter: @SalanietaT
>
> > Skype:Salanieta.Tamanikaiwaimaro
>
> > Cell: +679 998 2851
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > --
>
> > Katitza Rodriguez
>
> > International Rights Director
>
> > Electronic Frontier Foundation
>
> > katitza at eff.org<mailto:katitza at eff.org>
>
> > katitza at datos-personales.org<mailto:katitza at datos-personales.org>
> (personal email)
>
> >
>
> > Please support EFF - Working to protect your digital rights and
>
> > freedom of speech since 1990
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Regards.
>
> --------------------------
>
> Fouad Bajwa
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> IRP mailing list
>
> IRP at lists.internetrightsandprinciples.org<mailto:
> IRP at lists.internetrightsandprinciples.org>
>
>
> http://lists.internetrightsandprinciples.org/listinfo.cgi/irp-internetrightsandprinciples.org
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <
> http://lists.internetrightsandprinciples.org/pipermail/irp-internetrightsandprinciples.org/attachments/20120316/1cc4b482/attachment.htm
> >
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> IRP mailing list
> IRP at lists.internetrightsandprinciples.org
>
> http://lists.internetrightsandprinciples.org/listinfo.cgi/irp-internetrightsandprinciples.org
>
>
> End of IRP Digest, Vol 38, Issue 2
> **********************************
>
--
Jochai Ben-Avie
Policy Director
Access | AccessNow.org
P: +1-347-806-9531 | S: jochaiben-avie | PGP: 0x9E6D805F
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.internetrightsandprinciples.org/pipermail/irp-internetrightsandprinciples.org/attachments/20120318/342f7b0f/attachment-0001.htm>
More information about the IRP
mailing list