[IRP] [governance] Declaration of Internet Freedom

Tue Jul 10 04:28:35 EEST 2012

Thanks Dixie, great to hear more about this - sounds like a lot of work was
put into this process!  Does anyone know if there was an online public
consultation process? And if so where I could see it?

Thanks to all who have been a part of this.

 --
*Steve Anderson*
**Learn about The TPP's Internet Trap: http://stopthetrap.net**
*Executive Director, OpenMedia.ca
604-837-5730
http://openmedia.ca <http://www.openmedia.ca/>*
*steve at openmedia.ca

Follow me on Twitter <http://twitter.com/Steve_Media>
Friend me on Facebook <http://www.facebook.com/Steve.Media>

**Don't forget to t**ake a stand against warrantless online spying at:
http://openmedia.ca/stand*

*Confidentiality Warning:** This message and any attachments are intended
only for the use of the intended recipient(s), are confidential, and may be
privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified
that any review, retransmission, conversion to hard copy, copying,
circulation or other use of this message and any attachments is strictly
prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender
immediately by return e-mail, and delete this message and any attachments
from your system. Thank you.

Information confidentielle:** Le pr?sent message, ainsi que tout fichier
qui y est joint, est envoy? ? l'intention exclusive de son ou de ses
destinataires; il est de nature confidentielle et peut constituer une
information privil?gi?e. Nous avertissons toute personne autre que le
destinataire pr?vu que tout examen, r?acheminement, impression, copie,
distribution ou autre utilisation de ce message et de tout fichier qui y
est joint est strictement interdit. Si vous n'?tes pas le destinataire
pr?vu, veuillez en aviser imm?diatement l'exp?diteur par retour de courriel
et supprimer ce message et tout document joint de votre syst?me. Merci.*

On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 2:56 PM, Dixie Hawtin <Dixie at global-partners.co.uk>wrote:

>  Hi again,
>
> It's been brought to my attention that I may have underplayed the level of
> discussion about the 10 IRPs - the Charter is the result of an extremely
> broad consultation process (spanning years) both online and offline, with
> input from different stakeholder groups and in different parts of the
> world. The 10 IRPs too were shared widely outside of the Coalition,
> particularly with experts on each of the principles - for example the
> privacy article was shared with many privacy experts and there were several
> consultation with different communities. The huge discussions were both
> valuable for making the Charter so extensive and the 10 IRPs so precise -
> they were also extremely valuable in themselves for bringing together
> different communities!
>
> Very best,
> Dixie
>
>  ------------------------------
> *From:* Dixie Hawtin
> *Sent:* 09 July 2012 16:07
> *To:* Steve Anderson; Marianne Franklin
> *Cc:* irp at lists.internetrightsandprinciples.org
> *Subject:* RE: [IRP] [governance] Declaration of Internet Freedom
>
>   Hi Steve and welcome to the list!
>
>
>
> There isn?t a formal methodology (although if any of our academic members
> have written an overview please do share!)
>
>
>
> The 10 IRPs came directly out of the Charter (A very broad overview ?
> including previous versions ? can be found here:
> http://irpcharter.org/charter/)
>
>
>
> Version 1.0 of the Charter was launched at the 2010 IGF in Lithuania.
> During discussions a number of Coalition members felt that we needed a
> shorter ?punchier? advocacy document. A working group was formed within the
> Coalition of: Karmen Turk, Brett Solomon, Shaila Mistry, Henrik Almstrom,
> Carlos Affonso, Jochai Ben-Avie, Lisa Horner and me. We worked over email
> to distil the Charter down to 10 key principles. This was then shared with
> the wider Coalition and we had an email discussion on the principles and
> incorporated various changes. The 10 Internet Rights and Principles were
> launched at the second expert meeting on "Freedom of Expression and the
> Internet" in Stockholm, convened on 30-31 March 2011 by the Swedish
> Ministry for Foreign Affairs. Then many volunteers from around the world
> came forward and translated these into 21 more languages (all of which can
> be found here: http://irpcharter.org/campaign/)
>
>
>
> Best,
>
> Dixie
>
>
>
> *From:* irp-bounces at lists.internetrightsandprinciples.org [mailto:
> irp-bounces at lists.internetrightsandprinciples.org] *On Behalf Of *Steve
> Anderson
> *Sent:* 09 July 2012 12:29
> *To:* Marianne Franklin
> *Cc:* irp at lists.internetrightsandprinciples.org
> *Subject:* Re: [IRP] [governance] Declaration of Internet Freedom
>
>
>
> Hi all, new to the list. Can someone tell me or point to me to where I can
> find the methodology for developing the  IRP ten principles? Curious
> about how these were developed.
>
>
>
> best,
>
> --
>
> *Steve Anderson*
> Executive Director, OpenMedia.ca
> 604-837-5730
> http://openmedia.ca <http://www.openmedia.ca/>*
> *steve at openmedia.ca
>
>
>
> Follow me on Twitter <http://twitter.com/Steve_Media>
>
> Friend me on Facebook <http://www.facebook.com/Steve.Media>
>
>
>
> **
>
> **Don't forget to take a stand against warrantless online spying at:
> http://openmedia.ca/stand*
>
>
>
>
>
> *Confidentiality Warning:** This message and any attachments are intended
> only for the use of the intended recipient(s), are confidential, and may be
> privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified
> that any review, retransmission, conversion to hard copy, copying,
> circulation or other use of this message and any attachments is strictly
> prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender
> immediately by return e-mail, and delete this message and any attachments
> from your system. Thank you.
>
> Information confidentielle: Le pr?sent message, ainsi que tout fichier
> qui y est joint, est envoy? ? l'intention exclusive de son ou de ses
> destinataires; il est de nature confidentielle et peut constituer une
> information privil?gi?e. Nous avertissons toute personne autre que le
> destinataire pr?vu que tout examen, r?acheminement, impression, copie,
> distribution ou autre utilisation de ce message et de tout fichier qui y
> est joint est strictement interdit. Si vous n'?tes pas le destinataire
> pr?vu, veuillez en aviser imm?diatement l'exp?diteur par retour de courriel
> et supprimer ce message et tout document joint de votre syst?me. Merci.*
>
>
>
>  On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 4:22 AM, Marianne Franklin <
> m.i.franklin at gold.ac.uk> wrote:
>
> Dear All
>
> Thought I'd respond to some recent posts.
>
> 1) Declarations; I take Jeremy's point, and Wolfganga's. The mushrooming
> of declarations, charters and the like is perhaps a sign of some critical
> mass building.
>
> That said, the Declaration of Internet Freedom;
> http://www.internetdeclaration.org/freedom, boils the IRP Ten Punchy
> Principles, which already brought the original 3-tier Charter down to 10,
> down to 5 points. At this rate we could well see the IRP Charter or
> something similar fitting into a tweet!
>
> The IRP DC has yet to sign up to this Declaration. I move that we join it
> as I can see no reason why not.
>
> 2) As for the IRP website. I hope we can resolve this as having a defunct
> website is not good for business so to speak.
>
> 3) Re. Max's initiative. I have read and responded for my part!
>
> best
> MF
>
> On 04/07/2012 04:13, Jeremy Malcolm wrote:
>
> On 03/07/12 20:46, Benedek, Wolfgang (wolfgang.benedek at uni-graz.at) wrote:
>
>  What I wanted to point out as well is that we already have two more
> declarations under this name, the Geneva Declaration on Internet Freedom of
> 2010 by a group of NGOs
>
>
> Do you have a link for that?  I found http://www.genevasummit.org/media/20,
> but it is dead, nor is it on archive.org.
>
>
>  and the Guiding Principles of Internet Freedom of 2012 by Praxis think
> tank of Estonia, which are both more elaborate.
>
>
> Thanks, I added this to the links page at http://igcaucus.org/links and
> added years.  Am I still missing any?  Feel free to add this list to the
> IRP site too, or better, link to the IGC's copy.  BTW, does everyone know
> that the IRP's main website is down (but the charter site is up)?  Not sure
> about the mailing list, but I'm cc'ing to it in case it is up.
>
>
>  It would be good to bring all these initiatives together and the DC on
> Internet Rights and Principles would be a suitable place for doing so.
>
>
>
> Unfortunately, people seem prefer to work in parallel which might limit
> the effects of such efforts.
>
>
> Indeed.  Part of the problem is that whereas there are strong global
> action networks on issues like IP and the environment, in IG we have only
> the IGC, and it is invisible to (or at least ignored by) large parts of the
> Internet activist community.
>
> --
>
> *Dr Jeremy Malcolm
> Senior Policy Officer*
> Consumers International
> Kuala Lumpur Office for Asia-Pacific and the Middle East
> Lot 5-1 Wisma WIM, 7 Jalan Abang Haji Openg, TTDI, 60000 Kuala Lumpur,
> Malaysia
> Tel: +60 3 7726 1599
>
> Follow @ConsumersInt <http://twitter.com/Consumers_Int>
>
> Like us at www.facebook.com/consumersinternational
>
> Read our email confidentiality notice<http://www.consumersinternational.org/email-confidentiality>.
> Don't print this email unless necessary.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> IRP mailing list
>
> IRP at lists.internetrightsandprinciples.org
>
> http://lists.internetrightsandprinciples.org/listinfo.cgi/irp-internetrightsandprinciples.org
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> IRP mailing list
> IRP at lists.internetrightsandprinciples.org
>
> http://lists.internetrightsandprinciples.org/listinfo.cgi/irp-internetrightsandprinciples.org
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.internetrightsandprinciples.org/pipermail/irp-internetrightsandprinciples.org/attachments/20120709/4ad44f75/attachment-0001.htm>