[IRP] FW: [IDRC] testy testy test

[Ginger Paque]

Agree completely. Better to join our energies than to disperse them.
Tx. gp

Ginger (Virginia) Paque

VirginiaP at diplomacy.edu
Diplo Foundation
Internet Governance Capacity Building Programme
www.diplomacy.edu/ig
*The latest from Diplo....*From the fundamentals of diplomacy to the most
exciting new trends: check our three online courses starting in May
2012: *Bilateral
Diplomacy*, *Diplomacy of Small States*, and *E-diplomacy*.  Apply now to
reserve your place: http://www.diplomacy.edu/courses**



On 11 February 2012 02:59, parminder <parminder at itforchange.net> wrote:

> **
>
>
> On Friday 10 February 2012 07:29 PM, Lee W McKnight wrote:
>
> Yeah I had thought of suggesting this group all just subscribe to irp
> instead of creating a new list, especially not one that sounds
> so...Canadian ; )
>
>
> While it is everyone's right to form new associations, I could not see any
> clear differentiation from the IRP's mandate or work. But maybe I havent
> been looking closely enough. I agree with Lee's proposal. Keeping on
> dividing CS spaces may not be very beneficial to us. parminder
>
>
> Can our irp coordinators extend such an invite to the accessnow et al
> crowd?
>
> OK by folks?
>
> Lee
>  ------------------------------
> *From:* irp-bounces at lists.internetrightsandprinciples.org [
> irp-bounces at lists.internetrightsandprinciples.org] on behalf of michael
> gurstein [gurstein at gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Friday, February 10, 2012 8:55 AM
> *To:* 'irp'
> *Subject:* [IRP] FW: [IDRC] testy testy test
>
>  I must say that I'm somewhat confused here... maybe I've missed
> something... Is the new "IDRC" list meant to replace the IRP list?
>
> If so, no problem but I must say that the acronym "IDRC"  is quite
> unfortunate if not something of a major problem...
>
> Whether unconscious or conscious I'm not sure, but either way the acronym
>  "IDRC" is much more generally identified with the
> (Canadian) International Development Research Centre which pretty anyone
> who knows anything in the area of international development will
> immediately recognize and will, as was I, be thoroughly confused and
> disconcerted... (the folks at the IDRC who provide funding in Digital
> Rights areas among many others might be rather upset as well about the
> possible confusion.
>
> Best,
>
> Mike
>
>  -----Original Message-----
> *From:* irp-bounces at lists.internetrightsandprinciples.org [
> mailto:irp-bounces at lists.internetrightsandprinciples.org<irp-bounces at lists.internetrightsandprinciples.org>]
> *On Behalf Of *Mike Rispoli
> *Sent:* Thursday, February 09, 2012 3:35 PM
> *To:* International Digital Rights Coalition
> *Subject:* Re: [IRP] [IDRC] testy testy test
>
>  got it
>
> On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 3:58 PM, Jochai Ben-Avie <jochai at accessnow.org>wrote:
>
>> huzzah!
>>
>>  --
>>
>> Jochai Ben-Avie
>> Policy Director
>> Access | AccessNow.org
>> P: +1-347-806-9531 | S: jochaiben-avie | PGP: 0x9E6D805F
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> IDRC mailing list
>> IDRC at lists.accessnow.org
>> https://lists.accessnow.org/listinfo/idrc
>>
>>
>
>
>  --
>  Mike Rispoli
> Campaign and Media Strategy I Access
> +1-646-209-0802 I Skype: mlrispoli
> *mike at accessnow.org* <mike at accessnow.org>
> *press at accessnow.org*
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> IRP mailing listIRP at lists.internetrightsandprinciples.orghttp://lists.internetrightsandprinciples.org/listinfo.cgi/irp-internetrightsandprinciples.org
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> IRP mailing list
> IRP at lists.internetrightsandprinciples.org
>
> http://lists.internetrightsandprinciples.org/listinfo.cgi/irp-internetrightsandprinciples.org
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.internetrightsandprinciples.org/pipermail/irp-internetrightsandprinciples.org/attachments/20120211/c4ab109d/attachment.htm>