[IRP] Punchiness and consultation process
Mon Oct 11 09:13:10 EEST 2010
Il 08/10/10 13:09, Lisa Horner ha scritto:
> I?d suggest that once we?ve had the wider consultations and our
> administrator/steering committee has developed a new draft next year, we
> can have focussed discussions about outstanding issues and concerns
> within the coalition. For example, we might dedicate a week and a
> conference call to a set of defined issues to hammer out language etc.
> We?d need to adjust the proposed timescale to allow for that, probably
> ending the external consultation around May or June to give us time to
> finalise 2.0 within the coalition.
Maybe we could work in parallel - on one side working on the revision of
version 1.0 in terms of "punchiness", and on the other collecting a
"queue" of additional matters to be then considered for addition into
version 2.0, e.g. the more Internet-oriented ones.
Alternatively, there could be a phase after version 1.1 in which we work
on a version 1.2, examining submissions to such queue from the inside of
the coalition, before setting up a fully-fledged consultation process
with the outside.
vb. Vittorio Bertola - vb [a] bertola.eu <--------
--------> now blogging & more at http://bertola.eu/ <--------
More information about the IRP