[IRP] IGF review

Max Senges maxsenges
Thu Apr 16 22:22:41 EEST 2009


each journey starts with a first step - please whoever feels like drafting
some answers please step forward

max

2009/4/16 shaila mistry <shailam at yahoo.com>

> Hi Max
> It was late for me yesterday and I was falling asleep during the monthly
> meeting , in addition , yesterday was "happy tax day" in case that falls in
> the list of approved excuses. I apologize for not stepping forward to share
> in the responsibility for this review . I am actually packing to move and
> was reluctant to offer something that I may not be able to fulfill.
>
> I was thinking on this matter and have the following suggestion .Perhaps it
> is difficult for any one person to respond to all the questions. Max would
> it be a good idea to ask for individuals to step forward to answers at least
> those questions that they DO have something to say and have some prior
> knowledge and experience.
>
> I will do my part in this and answer some that I am passionate about or at
> least have a two cents worth.
> Once again I/we thank you for the responsibility that u have taken in
> leading all of us .
>
> Shaila
>
> *Life is short ....challenge the rules*
>
> *forgive quickly ... love truly ...and tenderly*
>
> *laugh constantly .....and never stop dreaming !*
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* Lisa Horner <lisa at global-partners.co.uk>*To:* Max Senges <
> maxsenges at gmail.com>; irp <Irp at lists.internetrightsandprinciples.org>
> *Sent:* Thursday, April 16, 2009 1:36:09 AM*Subject:* Re: [IRP] IGF review
>
>  Thanks Max.
>
> I wonder if we should focus our efforts on drafting a comment from the
> coalition on the draft programme paper (available on the home page
> http://www.intgovforum.org/cms/), stressing the importance of a higher
> profile for rights and principles in the forum.  I'll have a look at this at
> some point before the deadline next Tuesday (hopefully this week).
>
> We could all endeavour to answer the questions in this separate
> questionnaire on the importance of the continuation of the IGF as
> individuals?
>
> Lisa
> *
> From:* irp-bounces at lists.internetrightsandprinciples.org on behalf of Max
> Senges
> *Sent:* Thu 16/04/2009 09:05 *To:* irp  *Subject:* [IRP] IGF review
>
> Hi everybody
>
> i'll send some notes/results from our meeting later. But one point i wanted
> to put out urgently is the contribution to the IGF review. Below are the
> questions from the questionaire - if someone could please take the lead and
> suggest/draft some answers:
>
>  Questions:
>
>  1. To what extent has the IGF addressed the mandate set out for it in the
> Tunis Agenda <http://www.itu.int/wsis/docs2/tunis/off/6rev1.html>?
>
>
>
>
>  2. To what extent has the IGF embodied the WSIS principles<http://www.itu.int/wsis/docs/geneva/official/dop.html>
> ?
>
>
>
>  3. What has the impact of the IGF been in direct or indirect terms? Has
> it impacted you or your stakeholder group/institution/government? Has it
> acted as a catalyst for change?
>
>
>
>  4. How effective are IGF processes in addressing the tasks set out for
> it, including the functioning of the Multistakeholder Advisory Group (MAG),
> Secretariat and open consultations?
>
>
>
>  5. Is it desirable to continue the IGF past its initial five-year
> mandate, and why/why not?
>
>
>
>  6. If the continuation of the Forum is recommended, what improvements
> would you suggest in terms of its working methods, functioning and
> processes?
>
>
>
>  7. Do you have any other comments?
>
>
>
>
>
> < : > < : > < : > < : > < : > < : > < : > < : > < : > < : >
>
> Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful,
> committed citizens can change the world.
> Indeed, it is the only thing that ever has.
> ?----------------------Margaret Mead
>
> < : > < : > < : > < : > < : > < : > < : > < : > < : > < : >
>
> Dr. Max Senges
> Chair Internet Rights and Principles Coalition
>
> www.internetrightsandprinciples.org
>
> < : > < : > < : > < : > < : > < : > < : > < : > < : > < : >
>
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 4:31 PM, Max Senges <maxsenges at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi everybody
>>
>> As planned let's meet this thursday 16th of April at 8am GMT (i think that
>> should allow participation from many more timezones).
>>
>>
>> I think most agenda points are still the same. Proposed agenda:
>>
>>    - Review/Ammend&Add/Accept Agenda
>>    - report Human Readable Privacy project meeting in Berlin
>>    - Rudi: next steps Registrants Rights Charter
>>    - Meeting in Italy -- Lisa and others
>>    - contribution to IGF review
>>    - proposals for workshops (i know Bertrand has one on Rights in
>>    SocialNet(s))
>>    - re-development of our mission statement
>>    - re-development of our website content (i think we can improve a lot
>>    by targeting why people/institutions/companies should join and what they can
>>    do)
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> I have problems setting up the skype-conference call service right now.
>> Can anyone either recommend a conf-call provider or even offer to host our
>> call?
>>
>> Best
>> Max
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.internetrightsandprinciples.org/pipermail/irp-internetrightsandprinciples.org/attachments/20090416/266d98f1/attachment.htm>



More information about the IRP mailing list