[IRPCoalition] Fw: [DC] Plea for your responses: DC survey still open until 2 May

minda moreira mindamoreira at hotmail.com
Thu Apr 29 19:25:28 EEST 2021

Great! Thank you, Eileen!

Yes, you are correct that there are over 400 members in the IRPC list: we can select "other" instead to mention that.

Also agree on youth representatives in this DC (including in the Steering Committee); as for the structure, we can develop the text for clarity. The inclusion of links is a good idea and will include your suggestions on questions 39 and 40 too.

Best wishes and thank you again for your comments,

From: Eileen Cejas <eileencejas at gmail.com>
Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2021 4:36 PM
To: minda moreira <mindamoreira at hotmail.com>
Cc: irp at lists.internetrightsandprinciples.org <irp at lists.internetrightsandprinciples.org>
Subject: Re: [IRPCoalition] Fw: [DC] Plea for your responses: DC survey still open until 2 May

Dear Minda and all,

My apologies for not contributing earlier to the DC Survey. Some comments I can bring up:

-Question 4: According to the website you have 400 active members (I'm not aware if the numbers are updated but I think it's worth mentioning that number instead)
-Question 6: There are Youth representatives in this DC so all the stakeholders' groups are covered.
-Question 10: Besides mentioning the co-chairs, I think we can mention the other Steering Committee members for further clarification on the structure.
-Question 17: Add the links of the mentioned resources
- Questions 39 & Q40 could be the most tricky ones to fill and of course I suggest you go in the direction that you think best fits the IRPC.
Q39: I think we can refer that the dynamic coalitions can assist the MAG for instance on picking the IGF issues based on the discussions taken place on the mailing lists and events we host; besides participating at NRI events (a good example is EuroDIG, by allowing DCs to have pre-event sessions)
Q40: At the YCIG we mentioned that for the IGF Plus model and the MHLB it would be necessary to have DC representatives due to the work done on conducting discussions on a wide variety of IG issues, among other points. I guess something between those lines we can address for the IPPC.

Best regards,

Eileen Cejas

YCIG Steering Committee member, GRULAC Representative
Criminal Lawyer/Regional Engagement Director- Latin America and the Caribbean for Youth Observatory
Websites:www.eileencejas.com<http://www.eileencejas.com>, https://youthsig.org

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the individual named. If you are not the named addressee, you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this email. Please notify the sender immediately by email if you have received this email by mistake and delete this email from your system. If you are not the intended recipient, you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.internetrightsandprinciples.org/mailman/private/irp/attachments/20210429/dbbf0efa/attachment.htm>

More information about the IRP mailing list