[IRPCoalition] DCs survey : Final feedback before submission

Sun Apr 25 18:53:46 EEST 2021

Hi Minda,

As discussed in the meeting, I've provided my final comments on the
document. You can some details about the Davos Lab Dialogue below :

The Davos Lab is a new Global Shapers Community initiative to shape the
unprecedented and grassroots global response needed to the coronavirus
pandemic and other converging crises. Aggregating the insights, ideas, and
concerns of citizens in more than 150 countries, The Davos Lab will
culminate in a youth-driven recovery plan featuring tangible actions to
create a better future.

If you’re interested in joining The Davos Lab, please follow these simple
steps:

📌 Learn more about The Davos Lab here:
http://wef.ch/gsc-davos-lab

📌 Watch the session recording here:
https://weforum.box.com/v/gsc-davos-debrief

📌 To participate, register your dialogue today:
http://wef.ch/gsc-davos-lab-dialogue

📌 Read a step-by-step guide to hosting a dialogue here:
http://wef.ch/gsc-davos-lab-toolkit

📌 Share The Davos Lab survey with your networks (its open to all people):
http://wef.ch/gsc-davos-lab-survey

📌 Share the outcomes and insights of your dialogues here:
http://wef.ch/gsc-davos-lab-insights

Regards,
Raashi

On Fri, Apr 23, 2021, 22:03 minda moreira <mindamoreira at hotmail.com> wrote:

> Dear all,
>
> Please feel free to add any final comments to the DCs Survey *here*
> <https://drive.google.com/file/d/1zpD27O5UBKMmQlykQcmCjMkzOxDt4z-d/view?usp=sharing>
> .
> We aim to submit this Sunday to meet the IGF Secretariat deadline, unless
> an extension is agreed.
>
> Many thanks for all the comments and a special thank you to the IRPC SC
> for a long and very productive discussion on this survey earlier today.
>
> Best and wishing you all a very nice and relaxed weekend,
> Minda
>
>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* IRP <irp-bounces at lists.internetrightsandprinciples.org> on behalf
> of minda moreira <mindamoreira at hotmail.com>
> *Sent:* Friday, April 23, 2021 11:17 AM
> *To:* irp at lists.internetrightsandprinciples.org <
> irp at lists.internetrightsandprinciples.org>
> *Subject:* Re: [IRPCoalition] DC survey : Still time to add your comments
>
> Dear all,
>
> Thank you for adding your comments, the survey is starting to take shape
> and we look forward to having a closer look at the comments during the
> Steering Committee meeting later today. We will then invite you for final
> comments before submitting this Sunday.
>
> There is still time to add comments via this *link
> <https://drive.google.com/file/d/1zpD27O5UBKMmQlykQcmCjMkzOxDt4z-d/view?usp=sharing>*
> to the DCs survey on Google docs
> <https://drive.google.com/file/d/1zpD27O5UBKMmQlykQcmCjMkzOxDt4z-d/view?usp=sharing>
> .
>
> The last section, which is possibly one of the most relevant of this
> survey, would benefit from further input. Including below for reference:
>
>
>
>
>
>
> * DCs and the future of the IGF 35. Do you think that the relations
> between DCs and the IGF Secretariat and the MAG need to be strengthened
> (considering especially the future of the IGF and the role DCs could play)?
> Why? And how?  36. Do you have any suggestions on how to enhance the
> presence of DCs at the annual IGF meeting (e.g. regarding the DC main
> session and individual DCs sessions, connections with other intersessional
> works tracks and NRIs, connections with workshops/main sessions/high-level
> sessions/parliamentary track)? 37. Would you like DCs to be more involved
> in the planning of IGF annual meetings (e.g. in the selection of key
> themes/issues)? If so, how could this be achieved?* 38. In his Roadmap for
> Digital Cooperation, the UN Secretary-General has made reference to a need
> for the IGF to: (a) be more responsive and relevant to current digital
> issues; (b) have a more focused agenda; (c) have more actionable outcomes.
> How could DCs contribute to the implementation of these points?* 39. The
> Roadmap also calls for better integrating the IGF programme and
> intersessional policy development work. Likewise, the MAG WG-Strategy has
> suggested integrating intersessional activities more closely with the
> programme of annual IGFs, and the other way around. How do you see this
> implemented? And what role could DCs play, while preserving their
> independence and goals?* 40. Do you have any other suggestions on how DCs
> could contribute to a strengthened and more visible IGF (for instance, in
> the context of the proposed IGF Plus model)? *
>
> Many thanks and best wishes,
> Minda
>
>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* IRP <irp-bounces at lists.internetrightsandprinciples.org> on behalf
> of minda moreira <mindamoreira at hotmail.com>
> *Sent:* Thursday, April 22, 2021 1:17 PM
> *To:* irp at lists.internetrightsandprinciples.org <
> irp at lists.internetrightsandprinciples.org>
> *Subject:* Re: [IRPCoalition] DC survey : Still time to add your comments
>
> Dear all,
>
> The IRPC Steering Committee will be meeting tomorrow and we will be
> looking at / finalising the DCs survey.
>
> We will be sharing the document with you for final comments before
> submitting to the IGF Secretariat this Sunday.
>
> If you would like to include any comments ahead of our meeting at 12.00
> UTC tomorrow, please feel free to reply to this email or to use the *link
> <https://drive.google.com/file/d/1zpD27O5UBKMmQlykQcmCjMkzOxDt4z-d/view?usp=sharing>*
> to add your comments directly on the DCs survey on Google docs
> <https://drive.google.com/file/d/1zpD27O5UBKMmQlykQcmCjMkzOxDt4z-d/view?usp=sharing>
> .
>
> Many thanks and best wishes,
> Minda
> ------------------------------
> *From:* IRP <irp-bounces at lists.internetrightsandprinciples.org> on behalf
> of minda moreira <mindamoreira at hotmail.com>
> *Sent:* Monday, April 19, 2021 2:51 PM
> *To:* irp at lists.internetrightsandprinciples.org <
> irp at lists.internetrightsandprinciples.org>
> *Subject:* Re: [IRPCoalition] DC survey : DCs within the IGF framework
>
> Dear all,
>
> Thank you for your comments on *IRPC activities and outputs* to include
> in the DCs survey. Another important section in the DCs Survey is the one
> concerning Dynamic Coalitions within the IGF framework.
>
> I include the section of the survey below, which is open for comments.
> Please feel free to reply to this email with your comments. Alternatively,
> you can use the link to the the DCs survey on Google docs
> <https://drive.google.com/file/d/1zpD27O5UBKMmQlykQcmCjMkzOxDt4z-d/view?usp=sharing>
> .
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> * DCs within the IGF framework 27. From the options below, please select
> the ones applicable to your DC.* 1. The DC usually holds a session at the
> annual IGF meeting. √ 2. The DC hasn’t held a session at the annual IGF
> meeting in recent years. 3. The DC usually participates in the DC main
> session at the annual IGF meeting. √ 4. The DC hasn’t participated in the
> DC main session in recent years. If you selected option b): Please explain
> why the DC hasn’t held a session at the annual IGF meeting in recent years.
> If you selected option d): Please explain why the DC hasn’t participated in
> the DC main session in recent years. 28. On a scale from 1 (not satisfied
> at all) to 10 (very satisfied), how satisfied are you with the
> presence/representation of DCs at the annual IGF meeting?* Would you like
> to comment on your response? 29. Beyond participation in the DCCG and/or
> the DC main session at the annual IGF meeting, is your DC collaborating
> with other DCs? How? 30. Is your DC collaborating/has it ever collaborated
> with Best Practice Forums (BPFs) or other IGF work streams (e.g. the
> previous Policy Options for Connecting and Enabling the Next Billion(s))?
> Please explain. Do you plan any such collaboration for the future? Please
> explain. 31. Is your DC collaborating/has it ever collaborated with a
> national, regional or youth IGF initiative (NRI)? Please explain. Do you
> plan any such collaboration for the future? Please explain. We have member
> who are participants of the NRIs, ISOC,and Youth initiatives. 32. Would you
> like to add any comments/suggestions regarding the relations between DCs
> and BPFs, the recently introduced Policy Networks, and NRIs (e.g. how to
> enhance collaboration)?  33. What are, in your view, the most important
> elements that make DCs different from other IGF intersessional work tracks?
> 34. Please rate the following, on a scale from 1 (not at all satisfied) to
> 10 (highly satisfied).* - DC relations with the IGF Secretariat - DC
> relations with the Multistakeholder Advisory Group (MAG) Would you like to
> comment on your response? *
> Best wishes,
> Minda
> ------------------------------
> *From:* IRP <irp-bounces at lists.internetrightsandprinciples.org> on behalf
> of minda moreira <mindamoreira at hotmail.com>
> *Sent:* Tuesday, April 13, 2021 12:42 PM
> *To:* irp at lists.internetrightsandprinciples.org <
> irp at lists.internetrightsandprinciples.org>
> *Subject:* Re: [IRPCoalition] DC survey : IRPC activities and Outputs
>
> Dear all,
>
> We still have a couple of weeks left before the deadline to finalise the
> DCs Survey. It is quite a large document so I thought that we can start by
> adding input to the most substantial sections.
>
> There is an important section on DCs activities and outputs that I am
> sharing below for discussion:
>
>
> DCs activities and outputs
>
> 15. What mechanisms does your DC have in place to conduct its work?*
>
>    -
>
>    Discussions via the mailing list √
>    -
>
>    Regular online meetings √ (Steering Committee)
>    -
>
>    Working groups
>    -
>
>    Other. Please explain.
>
>
> 16. What type of activities is your DC usually undertaking?*
>
>    -
>
>    Producing papers/books/other publications √
>    -
>
>    Hosting events √
>    -
>
>    Other. Please explain. √  Participation as speakers at selected events
>
>
> 17. What types of outputs is your DC producing? Please provide links to
> exemplify.*
>
>
>    - *The Charter of Human Rights and Principles for the Internet
>    <https://internetrightsandprinciples.org/charter/>*
>    -
>
>    *10 Rights and Principles for the Internet
>    <https://internetrightsandprinciples.org/campaign/>*
>    -
>
>    *The Charter of Human Rights and Principles for the Internet
>    Educational Resource Guide *
>    <https://www.intgovforum.org/multilingual/content/the-charter-of-human-rights-and-principles-for-the-internet-educational-resource-guide-v2>
>    -
>
>    Session outputs and reports
>    <https://internetrightsandprinciples.org/category/reports/>
>
> 18. Please explain briefly how the DC is developing its outputs. (e.g. Who
> drives the process? How are members contributing? Does the DC hold wider
> open consultations beyond its membership? How are decisions being made?)*
>
> The IRPC Steering Committee (IRPC SC) is the main driver of the process of
> developing outputs, but all IRPC SC activities are shared with the wider
> membership and decisions are made taking into account the feedback of the
> list.
>
> Some outputs are led externally and in collaboration with the Dynamic
> Coalition, e.g., *The Charter of Human Rights and Principles for the
> Internet Educational Resource Guide  *
> <https://www.intgovforum.org/multilingual/content/the-charter-of-human-rights-and-principles-for-the-internet-educational-resource-guide-v2>first
> developed by a group of students of Syracuse University in collaboration
> with members of the list.
>
> Outputs such as the translation work (Charter and 10 Principles) have been
> often proposed by individuals or groups to the IRPC  SC
>
>
> 19. Please explain briefly how the DC promotes its outputs (within and
> beyond the IGF context).
>
> Outputs are shared and promoted via the list, on the IRPC website and
> through the IRPC social media channels. They have also been shared with the
> IGF secretariat and published via the IGF website.  IRPC activities
> (sessions at the IGF, NRIs other IGF related activities and beyond are also
> part of the outreach effort to promote these outputs.
>
>
> 20. Do you think improvements are needed regarding the visibility of DCs
> outputs (within and beyond the IGF context)? If so, how do you suggest this
> could be done?
>
> 21. Do you have any concrete example to share as to how your DC output has
> made an impact?
>
> 22. What do you consider to be your DC’s most significant achievement?
>
> 23. Do you have any additional comments regarding your DC’s substantive
> activities (e.g. challenges met in developing the outcomes/conducting other
> activities and how they were overcome, good practices in carrying out the
> activities)?
>
>
>
> It would be great to hear your views on these questions, particularly
> questions 20-23. I have drafted a few responses (highlighted in yellow) and
> happy to have your comments, edits there too.
>
> Very best wishes,
>
> Minda
>
>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* IRP <irp-bounces at lists.internetrightsandprinciples.org> on behalf
> of minda moreira <mindamoreira at hotmail.com>
> *Sent:* Tuesday, April 6, 2021 3:08 PM
> *To:* irp at lists.internetrightsandprinciples.org <
> irp at lists.internetrightsandprinciples.org>
> *Subject:* Re: [IRPCoalition] DC survey : Please add your comments by
> Monday 12 April
>
> Dear all,
>
> I hope you had the chance to have a quick look at the DCs survey on
> Google docs
> <https://drive.google.com/file/d/1zpD27O5UBKMmQlykQcmCjMkzOxDt4z-d/view?usp=sharing>.
>
> Some questions are very straight forward, but the sections below would
> benefit from a wider discussion:
>
>    - DCs activities and outputs
>    - DCs within the IGF framework
>    - DCs and the future of the IGF
>
>
> This is a great opportunity to have the DCs' voices heard and to help
> shape the future of the Dynamic Coalitions within the IGF environment. It
> also comes at a very crucial time for this Coalition as we mark the 10th
> anniversary of the Charter and reflect on achievements, challenges and
> prospects.
>
> Feel free to comment on the document
> <https://drive.google.com/file/d/1zpD27O5UBKMmQlykQcmCjMkzOxDt4z-d/view>
> or to reply to this email with your feedback.
>
> Very best wishes,
> Minda
> ------------------------------
> *From:* IRP <irp-bounces at lists.internetrightsandprinciples.org> on behalf
> of minda moreira <mindamoreira at hotmail.com>
> *Sent:* Friday, March 26, 2021 9:55 AM
> *To:* irp at lists.internetrightsandprinciples.org <
> irp at lists.internetrightsandprinciples.org>
> *Subject:* [IRPCoalition] DC survey : Please add your comments by Monday
> 12 April
>
> Dear all,
>
> Following my last email, here is the link to the DCs survey on Google docs
> <https://drive.google.com/file/d/1zpD27O5UBKMmQlykQcmCjMkzOxDt4z-d/view?usp=sharing>.
>
>
> All Dynamic Coalitions are invited to participate in this survey, which is
> collecting input on the work of each DC.  This will later feed into a DC
> paper that is being developed by the DC Coordination Group and the IGF
> Secretariat.
>
> This must be a collaborative exercise with all members of the Coalition
> and you are invited to comment on the document by Monday 12 April the
> latest.
>
> After that we will transfer the input on this document to the online form
> to be submitted to the IGF secretariat no later than April 25th.
>
> Many thanks and very best wishes,
> Minda
>
>
>
> <https://drive.google.com/file/d/1zpD27O5UBKMmQlykQcmCjMkzOxDt4z-d/view?usp=sharing>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> IRP mailing list
> IRP at lists.internetrightsandprinciples.org
> https://lists.internetrightsandprinciples.org/mailman/listinfo/irp
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.internetrightsandprinciples.org/mailman/private/irp/attachments/20210425/8e805644/attachment.htm>