[IRPCoalition] Flamewars Re: [governance] RE: [bestbits] Time-sensitive: 24 hour sign on period for ITU Plenipot joint recommendations
Suresh Ramasubramanian
suresh at hserus.net
Fri Oct 24 17:46:35 EEST 2014
I am absolutely glad to not continue a discussion on these lines. On the
ground and reasoned policy discussions on this list get increasingly rare
when terms like neo liberal are bandied around, a distressing repurposing
of the word liberal and all that it stands for, but I digress..
On 24 October 2014 10:30:01 am chaals at yandex-team.ru wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This by now pretty unedifying discussion about the finer theoretical points
> of different approaches to democracy seems to have outlived its usefulness
> to this group.
>
> It takes a certain kind of stubbornness not to recognise that there are
> extremely serious limitations to the capacity of a "multi-stakeholder
> approach" to be guaranteed to represent all the people. But then, that
> pretty much follows from Arrow's theorem, along with the fact that there
> are equally problems any other approach.
>
> We could argue about whether the model chosen for this group is the right
> one, if there were some alternative proposal. Otherwise, I'd love to see
> discussions related to some concrete proposal related to ensuring or
> improving the way that Internet governance supports improved Human Rights.
>
> (Yes, this is also what a "neo-liberal" would reply if they wanted to shut
> down a discussion they found uncomfortable. Unfortunately, there is no a
> priori way to determine whether my motivation is to spend my time doing
> useful stuff, or to use any rhetorical trick available to further my hidden
> agenda. So I'll just go with calling it like I see it).
>
> cheers
>
> --
> Charles McCathie Nevile - web standards - CTO Office, Yandex
> chaals at yandex-team.ru - - - Find more at http://yandex.com
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.internetrightsandprinciples.org/mailman/private/irp/attachments/20141024/63effb0d/attachment.html>
More information about the IRP
mailing list